Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #721997
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
59888 Re: DigSpace,
   Thanks for the response. I just found a site explaining that most of... 		Decomposed   POPE   05 Jun 2012
 3:58 AM
59887 Re: DigSpace,
   DS> So rather than find something where 100ppm effects a change... 		Zimbler0   POPE   05 Jun 2012
 3:46 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: DigSpace,

By: DigSpace in POPE
Tue, 05 Jun 12 1:01 AM
Msg. 59875 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 59853 by Decomposed)
Jump to msg. #  

Fine, on #33 , and I'll try to be gentle.


NOBODY, with real education in biology and or chemistry asserts that a difference of 100ppm as you describe is without relevance.

Again your statement:

"I've studied chemistry. There are NO significant systemic changes that occur with chemical
introductions at those levels. Any comments?"

Yes I can't find a link because ALL THINGS ARE EFFECTED AT THESE LEVELS.

Obviously you broke off your studies in chemistry, uhh, rather ... ahem, uhh, early.

So rather than find something where 100ppm effects a change (cause that is where the world of people who think about these things is) find one demonstrted event where 100pppm change in anything resulted in no consequence.

Just to cut it short. 100ppm is a lot, and current data blows 100ppm away.

Again, there are wacko lefts thinking we can make cleaner cars and have it all go away, there are pre-human folks like decomposed (or should I say post-human folks) that just thin that they've had some chemistry and 100 ppm aint anything.

Decomposed, people do not do studies on the impact of 100'000 degree hot iron on an eyeball, it is assumed average folk can figure that out.

Chemistry studies or not.