Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #722220
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
59974 Re: zimblerRe: Clinton in Arctic to see impact of climate change
   "I don't think sun-spot folks should get to vote." I don't think an... 		DGpeddler   POPE   05 Jun 2012
 10:12 PM
59964 Re: zimblerRe: Clinton in Arctic to see impact of climate change
   Hi DIG, or do you prefer the former moniker BTKs? Anyway, Just... 		micro   POPE   05 Jun 2012
 9:16 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: zimblerRe: Clinton in Arctic to see impact of climate change

By: DigSpace in POPE
Tue, 05 Jun 12 8:26 PM
Msg. 59960 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 59951 by DGpeddler)
Jump to msg. #  

no, I do not.

I have surveyed an adeuate collection of data and their resultant hypothesis to support my opinion.

I did not form my opinion first and then look for support.

There is a difference.

My current fascination is with the correlation between atmospheric carbon levels (ice core data) and warming (largely tree ring data and similar such stuff) with the argument that CO2 levels FOLLOW warming instead of LEADING or CAUSING warming. You should maybe look that stuff up. It would be a point you could use to support your pre-selected opinion.

This is all good academic stuff, and forms the foundation for denialism. But things ARE changing, and I think understanding that change, accommodating it, and influencing it if we can it what successful INTELLIGENT species do.

But what we have is the left saying if cars just got cleaner and the right saying its sun spots.

Bummer.

I don't think sun-spot folks should get to vote.