« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: War is good for the economy

By: Decomposed in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 11 Jun 12 10:06 PM | 56 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 60644 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 60566 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

War isn't good for an economy.

The SPOILS of war can be good for the victor - if he's not too badly beaten up.

It's far better devote oneself to building up one's infrastructure than to tearing down someone else's. War SOMETIMES yields the benefits of an infrastructure buildup. Perhaps that is why naive victors think that war itself is beneficial.




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
War is good for the economy
By: Zimbler0
in POPE
Sun, 10 Jun 12 11:38 PM
Msg. 60566 of 65535

Or is it?

A subject which needs debating.

http://www.swifteconomics.com/2009/03/21/war-is-not-good-for-the-economy/

War is horrible… but it’s good for the economy. I cannot, for the life of me, think of a more dangerous myth than that. This facade has become so prevalent in the national conscience that it’s simply taken for granted. The reasoning for this myth comes from an offshoot of Keynesian economics, in summary it says war stimulates aggregate demand and thereby gets the wheels of the economy turning again (or turning faster).
>>>>>


Zim:
War, per se, is not good for the economy. It is
destructive and it piles on debt.

On the flip side, factories built for the war effort
can churn out consumer goods at an unbelievable rate.

Technologies developed for the war effort inevitably
find themselves being 're-purposed' for civilian
needs.

We built numerous miles of rail road tracks during
the Civil War . . . after the War those same tracks
saved our farmers and factories tons of money in
shipping costs.

Factories to make trucks during WWI made trucks for
farmers after the war. Again, saving our farmers
and factories millions over the costs of horse drawn
transports.

And it just goes on and on and on.

Decomposed loves to gripe that deficit spending
causes inflation . . . so how come We did not
have high inflation during the Vietnam War - in
spite of the zillions spent on the war effort.

While Bush the second was waging his Wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan inflation was not bad . . . in spite
of the record deficits.

Personally, I liked the way Reagan waged War. He
employed a grunch of folks making ships for the Navy,
and engaged the Russians in an Arms Race . . . they
lost. And our economy prospered.

I plan on researching this a bit more.

Zim.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next