Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Gays and women in the military? 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Sun, 17 Jun 12 5:06 AM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report 		Msg. 61521 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 61508 by clo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

First off, two gay guys can not get one of them
pregnant and produce a future tax payer.

Society derives no benefit. So, it makes no sense
to provide a male 'wife' with the tax break given
for a pregnant-abled wife.

Women in the military . . . If a gal is in the
next foxhole over . . . the enemy is gonna
over-run us because : a.) the guy is busy 'getting some';
or, b.) because he was trying to protect her instead
of them fighting the enemy.

On a ship - the guy is supposed to be watching the
radar scope for incoming . . . not her pretty rear
end sashaying down the passage. (Gays? would a
gay guy watch the scope? Or another guys butt?)

Another reason for keeping women out of combat - has
to do with re-populating the country after the War
done killed off tooo many males . . . One guy can get
dozens of women pregnant a month . . . but a gal can
only produce one child every nine months. (Average -
add in breast feeding, twins, etc. etc.)

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: How many read this?
By: clo in POPE
Sat, 16 Jun 12 11:53 PM 		Msg. 61508 of 65535

ribit,

I've always had issues with women in battle. Probably because of my age. I believe women have more important skills, like creating life.
So much for burning my bra ;))

« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next