Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Historical perspectives 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Sun, 24 Jun 12 11:02 PM | 61 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report 		Msg. 62239 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62228 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

(Most of the more educated in here already
understand . . . I do wish the rest would
try to learn and keep up . . .)

1.) Clinton's surplus.

Did Clinton really run a surplus?
(Probably not because the debt continued to climb.)
What 'appeared' to be was most certainly the result
of capital gains tax payments on the ballooning
stock market. And when the stock market bubble burst
(as they invariably do) those 'capital gains' turned
into massive tax deducting capital losses.

Bye bye surplus.


2.) How did we get into the Iraq War?

A most important factoid the liverals find impossible
to recognize . . . John Kerry, Hillary, etc. etc. etc.
ALL voted FOR the invasion.

That john kerry would then campaign on 'We Should NOT
Have Invaded Iraq' clearly shows (to those of us who
do recognize historical perspectives) that kerry
is an idiot.


3.) How did we get into the current economic morass?

Congress instructed fannie and freddie to buy LOTs of
subprime mortgages. Congress de-regulated the
regulations segregating wall street from main street.

Worse still, congress vehemently denies any culpability
in the fiasco. Meaning that things will get worse
and or happen again . . . unless 'We the People'
elect some 'adults' who recognize the historical
perspectives (parallels between 1929 and today).

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Wingerworld
By: Zimbler0 in POPE
Sun, 24 Jun 12 7:54 PM 		Msg. 62228 of 65535

KTC> DG: You miss the point entirely, again.


KillTheCat,
You have yet to make a point.

Either A.) (most likely) you are simply a
. . . . . . . blithering idiot who prays we
. . . . . . . might 'understand' the incomprehensible.

Or, B.) you really do have a point but are just too
. . . . .stupid to properly educate us 'heathens'.

Or, C.) (possibly) you have been so brainwashed in
. . . . . tactics and thought patterns by harvard
. . . . . that, while trying to rise above the
. . . . . obvious idiocy that permeates that gyp-joint
. . . . . you employ the same stupidities that turned
. . . . . you into the village idiot in the first
. . . . . place.

If C.), you need to throw out everything harvard
'taught' you and look for examples as to how to
honetly debate. Learn a new way of understanding the
world around you. And, perhaps most importantly,
recognize the historical perspectives and learn to be
brutally honest and objective about them.

Zim.

« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next