« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Repeal it!

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 28 Jun 12 10:56 PM | 59 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 18724 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 18713 by DueDillinger)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

And Obamacare becomes the #1 campaign issue in a flash.




Avatar




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Repeal it!
By: DueDillinger
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 28 Jun 12 7:06 PM
Msg. 18713 of 21975

Short version, from what I can tell: the court decided that Obamacare’s individual mandate is not permitted under the Commerce Clause, but is permitted in terms of being a tax. Which means three things:

The President is a poor Constitutional Scholar, given that he claimed that the health tax was permitted under the Commerce Clause;

The President is a liar, as he promised not to raise taxes on the middle class.

Vote Republican in November. As a tax, we can get rid of this monstrosity with a simple majority vote in the Senate (HI, RECONCILIATION!).

http://moelane.com/2012/06/28/rsrh-the-health-tax-reconciliation-and-the-nightmare-scenario/


Obama imposes huge tax on the American middle class.  

That's the story, right? That's the spin for Romney. What's the spin for Obama?

UPDATE: Drudge points to Obama's assertion, back in September 2009 that the mandate is not a tax.

STEPHANOPOULOS: [I]t's still a tax increase.

OBAMA: No. That's not true, George. The — for us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it's saying is, is that we're not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, that is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I'm not covering all the costs.
I have said repeatedly that Obama would be worse off if Obamacare were upheld, but what I'm really seeing is how bad it is for him with the mandate declared a tax.


Remember the Democrats got the statute passed by insisting it was not a tax. Now, we learn it is only constitutional because it is a tax. That's got to hurt politically.

ADDED: Romney has at least 3 big arguments:

1. Obama imposed a huge new tax on working people.

2. Obama deceived the American people by saying it was not a tax, when it was.

3. The law made it look like money would go to insurance companies — in the form of new premiums — that would keep premiums low as the companies were required to take on people with pre-existing conditions, but now we find out that the money is really going to go to the federal government. [ADDED: So get ready for your premiums to spiral up and/or for insurance companies to be ruined.]

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2012/06/obama-imposes-huge-tax-on-american.html

UPDATE: RNC is quick with new ad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXZw6pF__3E

...and a tweet from Sarah Palin:

Obama lied to the American people. Again. He said it wasn't a tax. Obama lies; freedom dies. @SarahPalinUSA

Uploaded Image

∆∆


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next