Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Mandate ruled constitutional. Maybe? 

By: Beldin in POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Fri, 29 Jun 12 11:33 PM | 61 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report 		Msg. 62944 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62937 by clo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Because the Montana law attempted to abrogate the First Amendment rights of its citizens ... something The U.S. Constitution won't allow either federal or state governments to do ... and it involved campaign funding for the election of candidates for federal office, you twit.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Mandate ruled constitutional. Maybe?
By: clo in POPE
Fri, 29 Jun 12 10:37 PM 		Msg. 62937 of 65535

"One of the Supremes made a statement about the
ongoing process of the federal government taking
over state's rights. Kinda like Ike talking about
the Military-Insudtrial Comlex. That quote ought
to be framed."

snapits, which one, do you recall?

Why did they override Montana, they wanted to end Citizens United in their state, the Supreme's would NOT allow them....

« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next