Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Mandate ruled constitutional. Maybe? 

By: killthecat in POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 30 Jun 12 12:16 AM | 60 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report 		Msg. 62958 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62954 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

De:

Because it's not a fair contractual arrangement if the owners have all the money and all the power.

For the good of society, workers do need some protection from abusive work environments. Do you think Human Turds or free market forces will provide it? Business owners in it to maximize the money they make, which within bounds is OK.

Nanny State is your foolish description, not mine.


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Mandate ruled constitutional. Maybe?
By: Decomposed in POPE
Sat, 30 Jun 12 12:06 AM 		Msg. 62954 of 65535

ktc, 

re: "It's A-OK for some people to be human turds. Workers should always be treated as peons..."

Have you always had such contempt for workers?

I think of workers as equals to their employers. They are just as able to treat their employers as "human turds" as vice versa.

Employment is a CONTRACTUAL arrangement among adults. If either adult dislikes the arrangement, he should be free to depart.

Now, please explain to us why you think workers are inferior... children who need the protection of a nanny government?  

« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next