« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Mandate ruled constitutional. Maybe?

By: Beldin in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 30 Jun 12 12:22 AM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 62959 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62958 by killthecat)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Oh, so who looks at every contractual arrangement and decides whether it is "fair" or not, eh? You want the government to inspect every business contract and opine on its "fairness" ... as defined by you, no doubt ... before it can be signed?

Good grief, killthcat ... you're no businessman ... you're just an ignorant ideologue.

Willing buyer and willing seller ... willing employee and willing employer ... the participants are the ones who decide if the deal is fair or not.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Mandate ruled constitutional. Maybe?
By: killthecat
in POPE
Sat, 30 Jun 12 12:16 AM
Msg. 62958 of 65535

De:

Because it's not a fair contractual arrangement if the owners have all the money and all the power.

For the good of society, workers do need some protection from abusive work environments. Do you think Human Turds or free market forces will provide it? Business owners in it to maximize the money they make, which within bounds is OK.

Nanny State is your foolish description, not mine.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next