« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Obamacare costs skyrocket

By: killthecat in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 14 Jul 12 4:29 AM | 53 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 64231 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 64229 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Zim:

Did you read the whole Washington Post article or just the goofy stuff?




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Obamacare costs skyrocket
By: Zimbler0
in POPE
Sat, 14 Jul 12 4:02 AM
Msg. 64229 of 65535

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamacare-and-the-myth-of-rising-cost-estimates/2011/03/24/ABn6JmRB_blog.html

The venerable Congressional Budget Office issued an updated budget projection last week, and critics of the new health care law pounced.

In a news release, the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is chaired by Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), declared that “according to CBO’s latest estimates, the cost of Obamacare has increased by $500 billion. Meaning, in only one year, the cost has increased from an already staggering $938 billion price tag to $1.445 trillion.” The news release then cheekingly noted what a half-trillion dollars could buy. “1,002,004,008 iPad 2s,” for instance. Or “a Ford F-150 for every resident in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio and Omaha.”

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal had some different math in a March 23 editorial, saying: “Obamacare will be far more expensive than advertised. To wit, CBO says the entitlement's health insurance subsidies will cost $1.13 trillion between 2012 and 2021, not $1.04 trillion, the prior estimate. . . . CBO is conceding that it significantly underestimated the bill's cost.”

>>>


Zim: This is not new to those of us who have
brains . . . but maybe OCU will read it and weep.

Zim.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next