« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Republican Senator claims that the Aurora, CO shooter was clearly within his Constitutional rights to own and use high-capacity magazines...

By: Riana in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 22 Jul 12 7:44 PM | 81 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 44430 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 44429 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Oh, now that's a stretch. I don't buy that high-capacity magazines are constitutionally protected. You *can* get smaller magazines for AR-15 rifles - I think as small as 5 rounds, in fact. They are just a lot harder to find. The 'high-capacity' magazines are what the military uses (of course, their M16s are fully automatic, so a larger capacity magazine can actually be helpful in a firefight). As such, they are very common and readily available.

The problem lies in what constitutes a high-capacity magazine. Who gets to define that? As I said in a previous post to clo, if the arbitrary limit is set to 10 rounds, and someone fires all 10 shots, killing someone with the last shot, then suddenly 10 rounds is too many - we have to go to 9. And so on.




Avatar

What is the point of rules that are not enforced?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Republican Senator claims that the Aurora, CO shooter was clearly within his Constitutional rights to own and use high-capacity magazines...
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT
Sun, 22 Jul 12 6:51 PM
Msg. 44429 of 65535

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/22/ron-johnson-high-capacity-magazines_n_1692810.html


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next