« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 30 Jun 14 11:47 PM | 115 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 65228 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 65227 by weco)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Wait until the first court case where a company refuses to disclose, in detail, the religious beliefs and practices of the principle owners of a company. Or what happens when your stock broker is required to inquire about YOUR religious beliefs and practices when you try to purchase a large block of shares of a public corporation? After all, at some point, a small group of zealots could get substantial control of a corporation and if their beliefs could have am impact on the companies policies, if nothing else, the other stockholders will demand to know this before investing in or continuing to invest in a corporation. Justice Ginsburg was correct, we as a nation could be walking into a minefield.




Avatar

OCU


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage
By: weco
in FFFT
Mon, 30 Jun 14 11:37 PM
Msg. 65227 of 65535

So now before you accept employment, the Company must be forced to specify all it's Religious beliefs, in writing! Just so you know who you are really working for.

How many levels of corporate ownership applies to those beliefs, only the local management or a world wide international corporate view?

LDS/Mormon owned corporations like Alberson's don't use coffee, does that mean none of their corporate employees ever get a coffee break? They sell it, they sell liquor...


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next