« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 01 Jul 14 7:37 PM | 123 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 65288 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 65282 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Do you think vasectomies should be covered by insurance? How about ED treatments?

From another point of view; if you think that as a society, America needs to reduce the number of abortions as well as unwanted pregnancies in general, why would it not be in the best interests of the country to make contraceptives readily accessible to all women at little or no cost?




Avatar

OCU


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage
By: Zimbler0
in FFFT
Tue, 01 Jul 14 6:09 PM
Msg. 65282 of 65535

Clo> I believe this ruling proves yet again, republicans are hell bent on controlling womens' reproductive choices.


Clo,
I believe most Republicans would agree that a woman
has the right to buy all the contraceptive devices,
products, drugs, etc. etc. etc. she wants.

But, 'I' should have the right not to pay for it for her.

The 'affordable care act' . . . obviously, should be
seen as Un-Constitutional. The fact that both the
courts and the president are busy tying convoluted
'legal knots' trying to find some way to legitimize
it should be proof positive.

Once again. You have the right to buy all the contraceptive care products you want . . .

But you have no right to demand somebody else pay for them.

Zim.


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next