« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage 

By: Zimbler0 in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 01 Jul 14 8:57 PM | 136 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 65294 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 65288 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

OCU> Do you think vasectomies should be covered by insurance? How about ED treatments?


I think,
it should be up to the individual corporation to
decide whether or not to offer such treatments
under their health care plans.

The federal government should not have the 'authority'
to order 'You Must Pay' (or 'you must buy').

Does America need to reduce the number of abortions?
Sure, by reducing unwanted pregnancies.

Contraceptives are readily available. And, the cost
is not prohibitive.

The core concept you fail to recognize :

*I* should not have to pay for some bimbo's contraceptive needs.

(Unless I am enjoying the pleasures of intercourse
with her . . in which case, unless I don't want to
have a child maybe I ought to.)

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT
Tue, 01 Jul 14 7:37 PM
Msg. 65288 of 65535

Do you think vasectomies should be covered by insurance? How about ED treatments?

From another point of view; if you think that as a society, America needs to reduce the number of abortions as well as unwanted pregnancies in general, why would it not be in the best interests of the country to make contraceptives readily accessible to all women at little or no cost?


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next