Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage 

By: ribit in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 02 Jul 14 6:09 AM | 145 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 		Msg. 65350 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 65288 by oldCADuser)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ocu
why would it not be in the best interests of the country to make contraceptives readily accessible to all women at little or no cost?

...they are available at little or no cost. Tha being said, if I was an insurance company I would cover the vasectomies and birth control pills cause it's cheaper than paying for a kid.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court Rules Family-Owned Corporations Are Not Required to Pay for Contraception Coverage
By: oldCADuser in FFFT
Tue, 01 Jul 14 7:37 PM 		Msg. 65288 of 65535

Do you think vasectomies should be covered by insurance? How about ED treatments?

From another point of view; if you think that as a society, America needs to reduce the number of abortions as well as unwanted pregnancies in general, why would it not be in the best interests of the country to make contraceptives readily accessible to all women at little or no cost?

« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next