« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Amnesty

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 05 Dec 14 2:57 AM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 05597 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 05596 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The blonde is definitely not "desecrating".

The brunette is desecrating by just being and claiming to be one of us.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Amnesty
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT3
Fri, 05 Dec 14 2:51 AM
Msg. 05596 of 65535

But then you'd have to legally define what an 'anchor baby' is. How about a co-worker of mine and his wife who were here on a 2 year assignment from the UK? Their oldest son was born here in SoCal and so he's technically an American citizen although he now lives in England. Would he be considered an 'anchor baby' or would you grant him an exception because his last name is McConnell and not Garcia?

Be careful whenever you propose laws which requires a long and complex explanation as to what constitutes whatever it is that you're wanting to reject or protect. BTW, this is one the biggest reasons why we will never have an anti-flag desecration law in this country. It's judicially impossible to define what constituted, in sufficient terms that it would allow someone to be jailed or fined, a 'Flag of the United States of America' or even what would constitute desecrating it. For example, would someone wearing a bikini styled using the stars and stripes be guilty of 'flag desecration':

Uploaded Image

How about one of those Willie Nelson bandanas:

Uploaded Image

Or when a politician is trying to make a point:

Uploaded Image

Sorry about the diversion into the flag issue, but I was trying to make a point...


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next