Yep. There are all sorts of lies in just that brief excerpt.
Zimmerman was not "told not to approach." He was told "you don't have to do that" when he said he was following Martin. There's a huge difference between the police telling someone not to do something and the police telling someone he doesn't have to do something.
The statement that Zimmerman "provoked and scuffled with" Martin is a lie, unless you consider following Martin in the car to be provoking him, and being waylaid by Martin to be scuffling. The fact is, Martin had only two injuries: A bullet hole in his chest and bruises on his knuckles from punching Zimmerman in the face. Martin did his best to crack Zimmerman's skull, and the injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head testify to that.
As you noted, Martin had plenty of time to get away when Zimmerman told police he'd lost sight of him. In fact, the spot where Martin had vanished was just 125 yards from Martin's house. He could have covered that distance in less than twenty seconds. Instead, he elected to hide and then double back to attack Zimmerman several minutes later.
The prosecution of George Zimmerman was one of the most disgraceful abuses of power I have *EVER* seen. To sacrifice an innocent person just to quell a mob was, well, disgusting.
Journalists continue to lie, directly, through omission, or through innuendo, about what happened. Further, I note that most of the sites that post this sort of garbage don't permit readers to post comments. The cowards. It's the liberal way. Lie, and don't allow the truth to be heard.
Hmm. What other place that we're all very familiar with is managed like that? LOL. It too is run by a cowardly liberal.
| 
