FISA, 50 USC 1801, et seq., is a very limited method of obtaining surveillance authority. The reason for its strict limits is that FISA evades the regular federal court process, by not allowing regularly, Constitutionally appointed federal judges and their magistrates to authorize surveillance the Fourth Amendment would otherwise forbid. Instead, the Chief Justice handpicks the FISA court members, who have shown an exceptional deference to the executive branch. This is because FISA court members trust the government is only bringing them surveillance about pending terror attacks or “grave hostile” war-like attacks, as the FISA statute limits itself to. Thus, a FISA application can only be used in very limited circumstances.[b]
ALL the surveillance allegations by President Trump against O-Hussein will be proven to be absolutely correct.
Criminal Charges WILL be brought.
The ultimate defense that O-Hussein will have against the FISA crimes he committed will be this:
[b]The Russian hacking of the election was a "grave hostile" war-like attack on the U.S.
That is why the dems are going absolutely berserk in their attempts to 'prove' the Russians 'hacked' the election.
THE KICKER FOR THE DEFENSE - proving it was a 'war-like' action.
Now - search your memories - remember the TIMELINE when this happened ...
THE DHS DECLARED THAT THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM OF THE U.S. WAS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
Hyup - throws that 'declaration' into a whole new light - doesn't it. It was, and is, a desparate attempt by fascist asshole to close the barndoor and provide legal cover for criminal actions. Unfortunately for them, that DHS declaration was more than a few days late, and several dollars short.
http://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/06/statement-secretary-johnson-designation-election-infrastructure-critical
And that is PRECISELY the line of defense that will be used in the CRIMINAL TRIAL of B.Hussein.O.
| 
