http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/14/wellesley-college-student-newspaper-endorses-violence-against-unpopular-speech/
Wellesley College made news last month when professors declared "speakers with 'objectionable' views are not only offensive to students, but actually diminish their liberty." Now, the student newspaper at the elite private college has taken it a step further - justifying violence against anyone who "either continue to speak hate speech or refuse to adapt their beliefs" to accepted progressive norms, saying "then hostility may be warranted."
Ah, yes ... where to begin? The precious lil' snowflakes of the Wellesley Commune have, in general, unilaterally declared themselves to be the sole arbiters of what is, in their fevered craniums, "hate speech" - anything that does not toe the line of leftist ideology - and is "free speech" - whatever they and their leftist ideology happens to agree with. And, they have rationalized the use of force to get their way. Bless their shriveled lil' hearts ... how terribly totalitarian of them!
The shocking statement came in an editorial in the student newspaper, The Wellesley News, entitled "Free Speech Is Not Violated At Wellesley."
Well, the very title is a pathetic, hypocritical lie to begin with ... if they have their way, free speech will become completely extinct at Wellesley ... if it hasn't already.
"Wellesley students are generally correct in their attempts to differentiate what is viable discourse from what is just hate speech," the paper declared. "Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech; it is hate speech. The founding fathers put free speech in the Constitution as a way to protect the disenfranchised and to protect individual citizens from the power of the government."
No ... apparently, members of the Wellesley Commune are uneducated boobs who have absolutely no understanding of The Constitution, whatsoever. The Founding Fathers "put free speech in The Constitution" so individual citizens had the unrestricted right to speak truth to power - our government apparatus - especially when it is being run by would-be totalitarians like the members of the Wellesley Commune. And neither you nor the government has the authority to shut down the exercise of that right by unilaterally and illegitimately defining their free speech as "hate speech."
The editorial board at the paper then ascribes a new meaning to the First Amendment. "The spirit of free speech is to protect the suppressed, not to protect a free-for-all where anything is acceptable, no matter how hateful and damaging," the demand.
Sorry, you willfully clueless baboons ... opinions are like assholes; everyone has one ... so everyone gets to express themselves without you getting to decide the winners and the losers. Everyone gets to make up their own minds without you telling them how they must think.
The reason "hate speech" exists is that the United States is a racist country, according to the paper. "We have all said problematic claims, the origins of which were ingrained in us by our discriminatory and biased society. Luckily, most of us have been taught by our peers and mentors at Wellesley in a productive way," the paper continues.
Yada, yada, yada ... yeah, yeah, yeah ... the "United States is a racist country" because it just isn't Marxist enough and we don't want to put infantile buffoons like you in charge. ROTFLMAO! I like how you included yourselves when saying that everyone has "said problematic claims" and then immediately "exonerated" yourselves because, as self-proclaimed "elites" from the Wellesley Commune, you have been indoctrinated and programmed to overcome any intellectual recognition of your own massive, internal failings. Damn ... you must have broken your arm in patting yourself on the back that quickly! BWHA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Your two-year-old mentality is deliciously embarrassing for you.
As for speakers and student who do not conform to what the paper deems acceptable speech, the editorial says violence may be justified. "(I)f people are given the resources to learn and either continue to speak hate speech or refuse to adapt their beliefs, then hostility may be warranted," the editorial states.
And now we get to the heart of your totalitarian darkness ... if anyone does not willingly "adapt" to your prejudicial way of thinking, then you deem them worthy of violent punishment to hopefully "re-educate" them into mindlessly toeing the line of your leftist ideology. How terribly, terribly "tolerant" of you! BWHA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Got news for you, though ... there's something else the Founding Fathers put into The Constitution to deal with petty, would-be tyrants like you ... it's called The Second Amendment.
"If people continue to support racist politicians or pay for speakers that prop up speech that will lead to the harm of others, then it is critical to take the appropriate measures to hold them accountable for their actions. It is important to note that our preference for education over beration regards students who may have not been given the chance to learn. Rather, we are not referring to those who have already had the incentive to learn and should have taken the opportunities to do so," the paper concludes.
Ah, yes ... if everyone will only do exactly what you want them to do and only think exactly in the manner you want them to think, then a mindless utopia will reign and you won't have to impose violent, "corrective" measures to keep everyone on your plantation. Wow ... your delusional world is a dream come true for the fart-bubblers of the Further Freedom From Thought board ... but, it ain't reality, bitches.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
