SO,
after reading the MIT professor's report, and MIT is no friend of CONSERVATIVES, here is what I find disingenuous about it.
While at the same time claiming that there was no supportive evidence to cause Trump to order a missile strike,
the report also notes that the crater where the people are examining does indeed fit the description of what someone would see from a non-explosive type of bomb, and fitting the criterion for a chemical laden bomb.
So, without further ado, I guess my question would be
DID SARIN nerve gas deaths occur as a result of a chemical bomb or not?
If yes, then screw this libtard. IF NO, then we have conflicting information.
Note: I am not a huge fan of launching 59 missiles on a knee jerk reaction without verified proof.
On the other hand, it seems that most of the world knows SARIN gas was used on civilian population in Syria by SOMEONE.
Whoever that someone is, they need to know that perhaps they may be exposed to it also since they have no problem sharing it with other human beings, so if its good for others, it must also be good for them, right?
I bet those cowards would cry like babies knowing they were about to get gassed with SARIN, like they used on others.
Just my take on this.... You can agree or not. It is not an absolute...
| 
