Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

edited - links added - Re: The difference between poliitical scientists and political intelligence officials ...

By: monkeytrots in POPE IV | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 23 Apr 17 6:19 AM | 70 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board 		Msg. 24498 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 24496 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>> If ISIL had sarin, I've no doubt they would deploy it as well.
But, I don't see ISIL as having the capability to manufacture it

Already stated and answered, Zim.

Isil/Isis do have the capability of manufacturing sarin.
They do have the capability, and have used it. (UN investigation, 2013)

It may not be easy, but a bunch of kooks in Japan were able to make it way back in the 1990's with a hell of a lot less money at their disposal than ISIS has. ISIS also controls a chemical warfare manufacturing facility located in IRAQ - already documented.

And how much sarin from Syria's stocks has ISIS captured and stored ? A LOT of high level defections from Assad's forces, and a LOT of low level defections. Do you not acknowledge that they could have and probably did take many weapons, including sarin, with them ?

We can rehash this all you want - but the actual EVIDENCE that has been presented IN PULIC - points to the WHR (White House Report) as having been nothing more than propaganda - and not based in scientifically observed evidence of what, publicly presented, actually happened.

Guess it's kinda like those that claim that Sodamn Insane didn't have WMD's - and that they didn't get moved someplace. A lot of it ended up in the hands of SUNNI terrorists - and that means ISIS.

Isis seizes former chemical weapons plant in Iraq | World ...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/09/isis-seizes-chemical-weapons-plant-muthanna-iraq

ISIS Used Chemical Arms at Least 52 Times in Syria and Iraq ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/world/middleeast/isis-chemical-weapons-syria-iraq-mosul.html

ISIS Rebels Looted Iraq's Largest Chemical Weapons Plant
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/breaking-isis-rebels-looted-iraqs-largest-chemical




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: The difference between poliitical scientists and political intelligence officials ...
By: Zimbler0 in POPE IV
Sun, 23 Apr 17 5:59 AM 		Msg. 24496 of 47202

This is from 2014 . .
Zim.

>>>
Syria chemical weapons: the proof that Assad regime launching chlorine attacks on children

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10796175/Syria-chemical-weapons-the-proof-that-Assad-regime-launching-chlorine-attacks-on-children.html

President Bashar al-Assad is still using chemical weapons against civilians, a scientific analysis of samples from multiple gas attacks has shown.

In the first independent testing of its kind, conducted exclusively for The Telegraph, soil samples from the scene of three recent attacks in the country were collected by trained individuals known to this news organisation and analysed by a chemical warfare expert.

Our results show sizeable and unambiguous traces of chlorine and ammonia present at the site of all three attacks.

The use in war of “asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases” - both of which can be produced by chlorine and ammonia - is banned by the Geneva Protocol, of which Syria is a signatory.

The attacks, which in some cases used canisters marked with their chemical contents, were conducted by helicopter. In the Syrian civil war, only the regime has access to aerial power, making it now certain that the recent chemical attacks could only have been carried out by the regime, not the opposition.

>>>

Now, wasn't the 2017 attack with sarin gas?

If sarin was 'relatively easy' to make and deploy, wouldn't terrorists
have done so with it? From what I've read so far it is not easy to make,
and it is difficult to handle. assad had a well developed chemical
weapons program and I can see Syria being capable of making and deploying
it. If ISIL had sarin, I've no doubt they would deploy it as well.
But, I don't see ISIL as having the capability to manufacture it.

Zim.

« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next