Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: One of my 'unreliable scientists' reporting on the Idlib sarin attack 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE IV | Recommend this post (4)
Thu, 27 Apr 17 7:34 AM | 102 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board 		Msg. 24680 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 24674 by monkeytrots)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

MT> This missile attack on Syria is ABSOLUTELY INSANE.

That,
I believe I have to disagree with.

As I recall from your posting, the UN basically said
'WE don't know' who used the sarin in 2013 . . . .
That does not mean the 'rebels / terrorists' used it.

Was it sarin in 2013? I have to go back to my original
premise that it is highly unlikely that the 'rebels / terrorists'
could have gotten their hands on sarin.

And then I believe you posted a link suggesting 'they'
got the sarin from a captured Iraqi ammo dump (unlikely)
or from a captured Libyan ammo dump (also unlikely) or
how about a captured Iraqi former chemical weapons
manufactury (even more unlikely).

The story keeps changing.

Now it seems to be 'There was no sarin gas attack' -
it was staged.

Possibly. Possibly not.

But cruise missileing assad's military airstrip sends
a strong message that if he does use chemical warfare
on civilians again, the next time the tomahawks might
just be landing on his head.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: One of my 'unreliable scientists' reporting on the Idlib sarin attack
By: monkeytrots in POPE IV
Wed, 26 Apr 17 10:52 PM 		Msg. 24674 of 47202

Reuters ? http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3286966,00.html

Not the first time they were caught pubishing fake news and photos - and not the last. I was one of those that immediately caught the above bit of fakery - before others on the 'web' were chiming in.

The 'why would he' piece is nothing but conjecture. Not journalism- a highly slanted opinion piece.

One can, and I do, point out that the rebels have FAR more to gain by staging a chemical attack and blaming it on Assad than Assad does of doing the same.

Reuters and AP are both as bad as the NY Slimes.

As to the claim that I started out 'blaming the Rebels' -

Here is my FIRST POST on the subject, Zim.

This missile attack on Syria is ABSOLUTELY INSANE.

#msg-997669

Now, do I say that 'The rebels did the attack' -
or do I say that 'There is hell of a lot of doubt that Assad did the attack' ?

After reviewing THIS article, and many others - I did SAY that the REBELS were responsible in 2013 for the sarin attacks.

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin

Al Nusra (the Syrian rebels - close ties to ISIS and Al Queda) and Sarin: Hersh's Piece: "WHOSE SARIN ?"

My post: #msg-997677

I have subsequently read major portions of that UN report - and stand by conclusions about the 2013 attacks (multiple - not just Eastern Ghouta ).

Can we defeat Assad and the Russians in Syria ?
Undoubtedly.

The real question is; "What then ?"

Iran, Lybia, Irag, Afghanistan (both times, under Reagan and under Bush), Egypt (under Hussein.Ø) - What have we accomplished, what are the conditions for those people today, has muslim terrorism decreased ?

Keep muslims out of this country, attack them when WE are attacked and wipe them out - Otherwise, stay the hell out of the 'internals' of other countries. Let them kill each other - and let their allah sort it out.

« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next