« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: One of my 'unreliable scientists' reporting on the Idlib sarin attack 

By: monkeytrots in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 27 Apr 17 8:10 AM | 106 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 24683 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 24680 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Well - read the UN report for yourself, Zim.

While they were in the middle of rebel territory, they were highly constrained - and reported that they (the UN inspectors) saw munitions/tubes being carried by the rebels that seemed to be very similar to those used in the sarin attacks .

As to I said this or that - I pointed out numerous avenues by which the rebels could manufacture, seize, be supplied with sarin and with the components for manufacturing the sarin. If you choose to state that I said that any particular method, amongst so many, was how the rebels got sarin - so be it.

It would, however, be a misquote and a misrepresentation.

One should also bear in mind that the CIA has for decades wanted to remove Assad the previous, and Assad the curent - by any means. Also bear in mind that the SHIA are the 'minority' muslims, vastly opposed by Sunni ... and on top of it all ... that the current pogrom for REMOVING ASSAD came directly from Hussein.Ø. That last, alone, is enough to cast serious suspicion on anything coming from our intelligence services.

And to add insult to injury - WE, the US, have been and are guilty of training and supplying ISIS in Syria for a long damn time under the reign of Hussein.Ø; the muslim treasonous bastard - and that includes some prominent Repugs also - such as John F'ing McCain.

We stupidly continue to train Muslim forces - and equip them. I don't give a flip who those forces currently claim to support or oppose - it is stupid of the stupidest variety.

And no - I did NOT say a sarin attack did not occur - again you misquote me. I said that ONLY two (actually) three bodies had been examined by reputable (in this case BRITISH) examiners. What I said is that the whole affair could very well have been staged, and that muslim terrorist are renowned for doing so. If you think that mean I am denying that a chemical weapon was not used, then you are wrong.

Quit trying to attribute words to me that I do not say.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: One of my 'unreliable scientists' reporting on the Idlib sarin attack
By: Zimbler0
in POPE IV
Thu, 27 Apr 17 7:34 AM
Msg. 24680 of 47202

MT> This missile attack on Syria is ABSOLUTELY INSANE.

That,
I believe I have to disagree with.

As I recall from your posting, the UN basically said
'WE don't know' who used the sarin in 2013 . . . .
That does not mean the 'rebels / terrorists' used it.

Was it sarin in 2013? I have to go back to my original
premise that it is highly unlikely that the 'rebels / terrorists'
could have gotten their hands on sarin.

And then I believe you posted a link suggesting 'they'
got the sarin from a captured Iraqi ammo dump (unlikely)
or from a captured Libyan ammo dump (also unlikely) or
how about a captured Iraqi former chemical weapons
manufactury (even more unlikely).

The story keeps changing.

Now it seems to be 'There was no sarin gas attack' -
it was staged.

Possibly. Possibly not.

But cruise missileing assad's military airstrip sends
a strong message that if he does use chemical warfare
on civilians again, the next time the tomahawks might
just be landing on his head.

Zim.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next