Well - read the UN report for yourself, Zim.
While they were in the middle of rebel territory, they were highly constrained - and reported that they (the UN inspectors) saw munitions/tubes being carried by the rebels that seemed to be very similar to those used in the sarin attacks .
As to I said this or that - I pointed out numerous avenues by which the rebels could manufacture, seize, be supplied with sarin and with the components for manufacturing the sarin. If you choose to state that I said that any particular method, amongst so many, was how the rebels got sarin - so be it.
It would, however, be a misquote and a misrepresentation.
One should also bear in mind that the CIA has for decades wanted to remove Assad the previous, and Assad the curent - by any means. Also bear in mind that the SHIA are the 'minority' muslims, vastly opposed by Sunni ... and on top of it all ... that the current pogrom for REMOVING ASSAD came directly from Hussein.Ø. That last, alone, is enough to cast serious suspicion on anything coming from our intelligence services.
And to add insult to injury - WE, the US, have been and are guilty of training and supplying ISIS in Syria for a long damn time under the reign of Hussein.Ø; the muslim treasonous bastard - and that includes some prominent Repugs also - such as John F'ing McCain.
We stupidly continue to train Muslim forces - and equip them. I don't give a flip who those forces currently claim to support or oppose - it is stupid of the stupidest variety.
And no - I did NOT say a sarin attack did not occur - again you misquote me. I said that ONLY two (actually) three bodies had been examined by reputable (in this case BRITISH) examiners. What I said is that the whole affair could very well have been staged, and that muslim terrorist are renowned for doing so. If you think that mean I am denying that a chemical weapon was not used, then you are wrong.
Quit trying to attribute words to me that I do not say.
| 
